Vol. I
Makersfuel
A real publication for serious AI buildersFounders building with AIEst. MMXXVI
“Read what serious AI builders read.”Sign in
Jam No. 02

LinkedIn that does not sound like LinkedIn

Forty-eight hours to find a voice that is yours and post five times without cringing.

STARTS
Join the jam →

Why give it a weekend

  • An expert on your actual problem

    The live session takes questions about your product and your list, not the topic in general. That is an hour of consulting you would otherwise pay for, aimed at the thing in front of you.

  • Everyone else’s workflow, not just your own

    Every participant writes down how they did it, and all of them are published. You write one and you read the rest — that is the actual trade, and it is why the workflow is not optional.

  • A finished thing, not a plan

    A hard 48-hour deadline and a room of people working the same weekend is the reason this ships when the version you have been meaning to do for a month has not.

  • A permanent entry in the archive

    Your submission stays on the site under your name, linked to your maker profile, for anyone who reads the jam later. You can hide it whenever you want.

How the 48 hours run

  1. Done

    Joining opens

    Anyone can claim a place. Joining closes 24 hours before the deadline so there is time left to ship.

  2. Next up

    Kickoff

    The jam opens, the brief goes live and the resource pack unlocks.

  3. Joining closes

    The last moment to claim a place. After this the jam runs to the end with whoever is in.

  4. Deliverables due

    Submit what you shipped and the workflow behind it. Both are public by default, and you can hide yours at any time.

The expert

Sample Expert Two

Placeholder — replace before publishing

Placeholder bio for the seeded demo jam. Swap this for the real expert at /admin/jams.

What you submit

Ship one of:

- Five published posts written during the jam - A video teardown of your own profile before and after - A doc containing your positioning, your five posts, and the engagement each got

Plus the workflow: how you picked the angles, what you scrapped, and the rule you now use to decide whether a post is worth publishing.

The workflow, in four questions

  1. Where did you start?The raw material you began the 48 hours with — the list, the segment, the footage, the empty repo. Someone repeating this needs to know what you had before you began.
  2. What did you actually do, in order?The steps, numbered. This is the part other people follow. Include the tools and the prompts if you used a model — a prompt that worked is worth more than a paragraph about prompting.
  3. What did you try that did not work?The dead ends. This is the half nobody publishes and the half that saves the next person two days.
  4. What would you do differently next time?One thing. Written to yourself, 48 hours ago.

Submitting a video? Upload it to YouTube and set it to unlisted — anyone with the link can watch, and it never shows up in search or on your channel. File-sharing links need permission granted per person, so nobody can open them.